Archive for the ‘news’ Category

blogging baltimore

Sunday, October 11th, 2009

finally!

photo blog of Charm City:

IMG_3200
starting off with a gorgeous pic of my apartment. yes, this is where i live and i love it. small and cosy, super dusty but with three big bay windows and high ceilings. and my own bathroom (MY OWN BATHROOM I LOVE IT), albeit no kitchen. i love looking at the tree outside my window, it’s slowly turning brown now that fall’s here. i have a basil plant that is dying on me (i can’t nurture anything for the life of me, hence i do not have a pet) and a ‘rose of jericho’ - a desert plant that ‘opens up’ when watered, though no flowers bloom. oh, that book is the ‘collected writings of robert smithson’. note, ‘collected’, not ’selected’. as much respect i have for his artwork and thoughts, that guy must have been stoned for most of his very short life.

IMG_3220
just to emphasize how baltimore can be pretty too, here’s the view from my window. that domed thing in the distance is a church. i am living in the ‘mount vernon cultural district’: theaters, concert halls, galleries, museums, indie cinema, bike co-op (filled with too-hipster-bike-hipsters), anarchist cafe, thrift stores. how’s that for accumulating cultural capital? beats cliche greenwich, eh?

IMG_3209
perfect time for farmer’s market! so many queer-looking tomatoes. where i am going to get my fresh produce when winter rolls around?

DSC00121
first awesome speaker in the line of awesome speakers at MICA (that’s where i’m studying by the way): ANGELA DAVIS! AMY GOODMAN! DEMOCRACY NOW! by the way, amy goodman blew. my. mind. so powerful. so eloquent. so inspiring. everyone needs to hear her speak at least once in a lifetime

(then we had Annie Sprinkle. oh and guess who’s coming next? DJ SPOOKY aahhhh! so nice to be a student again)

DSC00123
what we do at art school: throw parties in our studios! nothing beats getting drunk on a dancefloor next to bansaws and tablesaws. here’s the balloon room

DSC00128
art student solution to stolen bike seat: build your own! and what’s even better, leave the pencil marks on the plywood for all to see! this is potentially a cool performance piece. how much do i love perpetuating the art student stereotype? sooo much.

DSC00130
lantini party! helping out with nana projects right now, and as a fundraiser for the annual great halloween lantern parade, we hold adult-oriented lantern building workshops + martinis! lantinis! i’m planning to learn how to stilt walk at the parade school -

DSC00127
quintessential american disclaimer, right there on my “small” styrofoam cup of watered-down nestea (to wash down my $1 hot dog at the Sam’s Club in-store fastfood stand. ugh). strip mall after strip mall. reminds me of time in canada, i haven’t been to a strip mall since i moved back to hong kong, not even in philly. and now im cruising the highway with my mates in a pickup truck, jumping from costco to home depot practically every other day! YES AMERICA

DSC00125
speaking of philly, i was there a couple weekends ago and loved it. it was wet, it was cold, it was fantastic. here’s a melancholy pic of a long stretch of highway from the bus

cause in my head there’s a greyhound station/
where I send my thoughts to far off destinations/
so they may have a chance of finding a place/
where they’re far more suited than here/

-Death Cab for Cutie, Soul Meets Body

art collection #2

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009

what is this?

so i was wandering around the salvation army in kowloon tong the other day, when i came across at least a dozen packs of the above. it was the mini barbara kruger that caught my eye.

on closer inspection, all the little weird pieces in the pack are miniature art pieces by well-known contemporary artists, scaled 1:12. along with Kruger, there’s Sarah Charlesworth Red Mask, Alan McCollum 5 Perfect Vehicles, Lisa Yuskavage Blonde Brunette and Redhead, Alexander Ross Untitled, John Newman Bubbles Burst (the weird blue thing that dominates the entire pack).

aside from boxes of this ‘art collection #2′, i found boxes and boxes of figurines, toiletries, teacups and mini furniture designed by established architects and artists, all part of The Kaleidoscope House. weird. the only thing that i couldn’t find was ‘art collection #1′. and everything was copyrighted under Bozart Toys and Laurie Simmons. another artist? that was enough to make me want to buy an iphone just so i could google this thing right away.

upon returning to my cubicle at work, this is what i found:
The Kaleidescope house is an interactive creative play environment for 6-year olds, conceived and designed by Simmons and Peter Wheelwright. Here’s an NYTimes article regarding the project. Simmons also has a blurb about it on her site. Bozart itself seems to be missing a website, despite all the hubbub surrounding their artist-type toys.

since everything at the salvation army was donated, i figured a toy manufacturer gave away all of these. selling price, HK$25. take note of the original selling price here, and the ebay prices here.

seems like an investment opportunity (and not really)! i’m a little disappointed by the quality of the toys… they look sort of rough and unpolished. so random to come across this in the least likely of places.

revitalizing historic buildings through partnership scheme

Wednesday, February 18th, 2009

the Hong Kong government has just announced their selections for six ‘revitalization projects’. under the first phase of this scheme, six historical buildings in HK will each be managed by NGOs who submitted proposals for building conservation and creative projects earlier.

read press release here.

the selections have been controversial, especially for the North Kowloon Magistracy in Sham Shui Po. Savannah College of Art and Design, from Georgia, USA, was selected, raising concerns as to why this foreign, private art school was chosen.

so what was the government thinking? why put in a foreign art school in direct competition with the local art schools (Hong Kong Art School, City University’s SCM, Polytechnic School of Design, IVE, BU’s Academy of Visual Arts…)? i understand that competition can be a healthy thing, and that exposure to international concepts can spur creativitiy, but not when local artistic initiatives are already not getting enough support. i don’t think i’m being territorial; i just think it doesn’t make sense. if we wanted a healthy art education system, more should be done to nurture existing projects. why suddenly claim that an additional school would encourage creativity? really, it’s all for show, as if the government ‘really’ cared. and it’s not even like we don’t have the resources for the arts; it’s just that the resources are not allocated adequately or sufficiently towards art and design education.

second. why Savannah College of Art and Design? (check out SCAD’s HK website here, it’s already up and running) in all honesty, with my many many (too many) hours spent looking at fine arts graduate programs in the US, never once had i even considered SCAD. i find rankings suspicious in general, but let me just put it this way; a ranking is still a ranking, and no matter how inaccurate they are, they are endorsed by society because they have an aura of legitimacy. with that said, nowhere on the top 50 fine arts schools list in US News can we find SCAD. call me superficial, but this is what people refer to when judging one school from the next. moreover, how are they able to come up with so many professional degree programs in such a short period of time (two years?) BA, BFA, MA, MFA… digital art, studio art, art history… woah.

and why, why give a wealthy private institution the valuable resource of LAND? there are plenty NGOs to choose from who don’t have enough space or land that could benefit from the scheme. is it perhaps because SCAD has already claimed that the government will not need to subsidies any of the renovations, and that it is self-sufficient (meaning each student who enrolls pays HK$24,000 in school fees)?

on the more embarrassing side, Jacky Chan was given an honorary professorship from SCAD (click on his mug on SCAD’s HK website… it is so scary. so so scary.). dude. c’mon. who in his right mind would give an honorary professorship to JACKY CHAN of all people? and can SCAD’s promotional videos not be so stereotypically “chinese”? what sort of design school is this, promoting such ‘exotic’ cliches? With a high faculty rate turnover in their US campus, i wonder if they are really as reputable as they claim themselves to be.

all in all, the more i think about this, the more heated i get. i don’t know what the HK government is thinking, or perhaps they’re just not thinking at all. the worst part is that there has been no transparency in the scheme; no one within the cultural sector knew about the procedure or the guidelines for the selections, some were even surprised to find out that such a scheme existed. you would think that after all that trouble they got into from the West Kowloon Cultural District project that they would learn from their past mistakes…

we better fuckin’ LOVE what we’re doing…

Friday, February 6th, 2009

Starving artists? That’s not far from the mark

Earnings by most Canadian artists are hovering at poverty levels and the situation is likely to worsen as the worldwide recession deepens, according to a statistical profile of the country’s artists released yesterday.

The findings of the 43-page study, prepared by Hill Strategies Research of Hamilton for Canadian Heritage, the Canada Council for the Arts and the Ontario Arts Council, are derived from the 2006 census. It identified 140,000 Canadians as artists – defined as those who spent most of their working time in nine occupational categories, including actors, dancers, authors/writers, visual artists and producers/directors/choreographers.

The study reports that artists over all are working for near-poverty-level wages, with an average annual earnings in calendar year 2005 of just $22,731, compared with $36,301 for all Canadian workers – a 37-per-cent wage chasm.

In fact, of the 140,000 artists analyzed, 43 per cent earned less than $10,000, whereas in the overall labour force that percentage was 25 per cent. The study notes that the $22,700 average is only 9 per cent higher than the $20,800 that Statistics Canada has identified as the “low-income cutoff” for a single person living in a city with 500,000 people or more.

What makes the situation even more distressing is that artist earnings have been decreasing since 1990 – a decline likely to intensify over the next two years. While average earnings for the overall labour force rose by almost 10 per cent from 1990 to 2005, artists experienced a slide of 11 per cent – to $22,731 from $25,433 – at the same time as the cultural-sector work force tripled in size. Actors experienced the sharpest decline in average earnings among artists, dropping 34 per cent to about $18,000 in 2005.

According to the Hill study, the poorest-paid Canadian artist category is that of female visual artist, with average earnings in 2005 of $11,421, closely followed by female artisan/craftsperson ($12,307), female musician/singer ($12,449), and female dancer ($12,502).

Indeed, while there are more female artists than males (74,000 versus 66,000) in the country, female artists over all earn much less than their male counterparts: In 2005, a female artist earned on average $19,175, a male $26,714 – a span of close to 30 per cent.

If there is a “labour aristocracy” among artists, it’s those 22,370 individuals who identified themselves as “producers/directors/choreographers” in the 2006 census. Males in that category averaged earnings of just under $45,000 while females received $42,000. Francophone artists in Quebec over all are better remunerated than their anglophone equivalents, but not significantly better: According to the survey, they earned an average of $24,520 in 2005, a gap of about 7 per cent.

Other highlights:

Artists are aging along with the rest of the labour force: In 2006, 61,000 artists – 43 per cent of the total analyzed – were 45 years of age and older. This was a 121-per-cent increase in that category from the early 1990s.

Aboriginal artists are especially poor earners – just $15,900 on average, 30-per-cent lower than the average for all artists.

Forty-two per cent of the artists analyzed described themselves as self-employed, compared with 7 per cent for the economy as a whole.

Unsurprisingly, given the low earnings from their art, Canadian artists rely on part-time work to get by: In 2005, 42 per cent of artists said they took part-time jobs, compared with 22 per cent for the overall labour force.

While artists earn much less than the overall labour force and outnumber the workers directly employed by the Canadian automotive sector (140,000 versus 135,000), they’re better educated than most Canadians. The Hill study reports that 39 per cent of all Canadian artists have at least a university degree at the bachelor’s level, whereas for the overall labour force the percentage is 21.

-globeandmail.com

not cool.

Sunday, January 18th, 2009

“Then I saw Grace Mugabe coming at me. She launched herself at me, tried to grab my camera and then directed punches at my face. She hit me at least 10 times in the face and head.

“She was wearing a diamond-encrusted ring that cut into me when she hit me. She was screaming and shouting, and her bodyguard was, too. I was holding on to the camera so I couldn’t defend myself.

Mrs Mugabe was in Hong Kong as part of an Asian holiday that began in early January in the Malaysian resort island of Langkawi and then continued to Singapore, where she was joined by husband, The Sunday Times reported.

The president’s wife, whose country is heavily dependent on food aid, flew to Hong Kong without her husband on January 9 and stayed with her entourage in a suite costing about HK$6,850 a night, the newspaper said.

-scmp.com (thanks I for the heads up)


if i had known i would have stalked her and slapped her in the face. wtf are they doing to their country?!

Gaza

Wednesday, January 14th, 2009

How Israel Brought Gaza to the Brink of Humanitarian Catastrophe

happy 100 lévi-strauss

Saturday, November 29th, 2008

Mr. Levi-Strauss took difference as the basis for his study, not the search for commonality, which defined 19th-century anthropology. In other words, he took cultures on their own terms rather than try to relate everything to the West.

In 1996, when asked his opinion of the project [Musée du Quai Branly], Mr. Lévi-Strauss said in a handwritten letter to Mr. Chirac: “It takes into account the evolution of the world since the Musée de l’Homme was created. An ethnographic museum can no longer, as at that time, offer an authentic vision of life in these societies so different from ours. With perhaps a few exceptions that will not last, these societies are progressively integrated into world politics and economy. When I see the objects that I collected in the field between 1935 and 1938 again — and it’s also true of others — I know that their relevance has become either documentary or, mostly, aesthetic.”

read full article here

from Mandela to Obama

Sunday, November 9th, 2008

5 November 2008

Senator Barack Obama,

Chicago

Dear Senator Obama,

We join people in your country and around the world in congratulating you on becoming the President-Elect of the United States. Your victory has demonstrated that no person anywhere in the world should not dare to dream of wanting to change the world for a better place.

We note and applaud your commitment to supporting the cause of peace and security around the world. We trust that you will also make it the mission of your Presidency to combat the scourge of poverty and disease everywhere.

We wish you strength and fortitude in the challenging days and years that lie ahead. We are sure you will ultimately achieve your dream making the United States of America a full partner in a community of nations committed to peace and prosperity for all.

Sincerely,

N R Mandela

- NYTimes.com

thanks E for the forward!

Uncritical Exuberance

Saturday, November 8th, 2008

Uncritical Exuberance?

Judith Butler

Very few of us are immune to the exhilaration of this time.  My friends on the left write to me that they feel something akin to “redemption” or that “the country has been returned to us” or that “we finally have one of us in the White House.”  Of course, like them, I discover myself feeling overwhelmed with disbelief and excitement throughout the day, since the thought of having the regime of George W. Bush over and gone is an enormous relief. And the thought of Obama, a thoughtful and progressive black candidate, shifts the historical ground, and we feel that cataclysm as it produces a new terrain.  But let us try to think carefully about the shifted terrain, although we cannot fully know its contours at this time.  The election of Barack Obama is historically significant in ways that are yet to be gauged, but it is not, and cannot be, a redemption, and if we subscribe to the heightened modes of identification that he proposes (”we are all united”) or that we propose (”he is one of us”), we risk believing that this political moment can overcome the antagonisms that are constitutive of political life, especially political life in these times.  There have always been good reasons not to embrace “national unity” as an ideal, and to nurse suspicions toward absolute and seamless identification with any political leader.  After all, fascism relied in part on that seamless identification with the leader, and Republicans engage this same effort to organize political affect when, for instance, Elizabeth Dole looks out on her audience and says, “I love each and every one of you.” 

It becomes all the more important to think about the politics of exuberant identification with the election of Obama when we consider that support for Obama has coincided with support for conservative causes.  In a way, this accounts for his “cross-over” success.  In California, he won by 60% of the vote, and yet some significant portion of those who voted for him also voted against the legalization of gay marriage (52%). How do we understand this apparent disjunction?  First, let us remember that Obama has not explicitly supported gay marriage rights. Further, as Wendy Brown has argued, the Republicans have found that the electorate is not as galvanized by “moral” issues as they were in recent elections; the reasons given for why people voted for Obama seem to be predominantly economic, and their reasoning seems more fully structured by neo-liberal rationality than by religious concerns.  This is clearly one reason why Palin’s assigned public function to galvanize the majority of the electorate on moral issues finally failed.   But if “moral” issues such as gun control, abortion rights and gay rights were not as determinative as they once were, perhaps that is because they are thriving in a separate compartment of the political mind.  In other words, we are faced with new configurations of political belief that make it possible to hold apparently discrepant views at the same time: someone can, for instance, disagree with Obama on certain issues, but still have voted for him.  This became most salient in the emergence of the counter Bradley-effect, when voters could and did explicitly own up to their own racism, but said they would vote for Obama anyway. Anecdotes from the field include claims like the following: “I know that Obama is a Muslim and a Terrorist, but I will vote for him anyway; he is probably better for the economy.”  Such voters got to keep their racism and vote for Obama, sheltering their split beliefs without having to resolve them.

Along with strong economic motivations, less empirically discernible factors have come into play in these election results. We cannot underestimate the force of dis-identification in this election, a sense of revulsion that George W. has “represented” the United States to the rest of the world, a sense of shame about our practices of torture and illegal detention, a sense of disgust that we have waged war on false grounds and propagated racist views of Islam, a sense of alarm and horror that the extremes of economic deregulation have led to a global economic crisis.  Is it despite his race, or because of his race, that Obama finally emerged as a preferred representative of the nation?  Fulfilling that representative-function, he is at once black and not-black (some say “not black enough” and others say “too black”), and, as a result, he can appeal to voters who not only have no way of resolving their ambivalence on this issue, but do not want one. The public figure who allows the populace to sustain and mask its ambivalence nevertheless appears as a figure of “unity”: this is surely an ideological function. Such moments are intensely imaginary, but not for that reason without their political force.

 As the election approached, there has been an increased focus on the person of Obama: his gravity, his deliberateness, his ability not to lose his temper, his way of modeling a certain evenness in the face of hurtful attacks and vile political rhetoric, his promise to reinstate a version of the nation that will overcome its current shame.  Of course, the promise is alluring, but what if the embrace of Obama leads to the belief that we might overcome all dissonance, that unity is actually possible?  What is the chance that we may end up suffering a certain inevitable disappointment when this charismatic leader displays his fallibility, his willingness to compromise, even to sell out minorities? He has, in fact, already done this in certain ways, but many of us “set aside” our concerns in order to enjoy the extreme un-ambivalence of this moment, risking an uncritical exuberance even when we know better.  Obama is, after all, hardly a leftist, regardless of the attributions of “socialism” proffered by his conservative opponents.  In what ways will his actions be constrained by party politics, economic interests, and state power; in what ways have they been compromised already?  If we seek through this presidency to overcome a sense of dissonance, then we will have jettisoned critical politics in favor of an exuberance whose phantasmatic dimensions will prove consequential.  Maybe we cannot avoid this phantasmatic moment, but let us be mindful about how temporary it is. If there are avowed racists who have said, “I know that he is a Muslim and a terrorist, but I will vote for him anyway,” there are surely also people on the left who say, “I know that he has sold out gay rights and Palestine, but he is still our redemption.”  I know very well, but still: this is the classic formulation of disavowal. Through what means do we sustain and mask conflicting beliefs of this sort?  And at what political cost?

 There is no doubt that Obama’s success will have significant effects on the economic course of the nation, and it seems reasonable to assume that we will see a new rationale for economic regulation and for an approach to economics that resembles social democratic forms in Europe; in foreign affairs, we will doubtless see a renewal of multi-lateral relations, the reversal of a fatal trend of destroying multilateral accords that the Bush administration has undertaken.  And there will doubtless also be a more generally liberal trend on social issues, though it is important to remember that Obama has not supported universal health care, and has failed to explicitly support gay marriage rights. And there is not yet much reason to hope that he will formulate a just policy for the United States in the Middle East, even though it is a relief, to be sure, that he knows Rashid Khalidi. 

The indisputable significance of his election has everything to do with overcoming the limits implicitly imposed on African-American achievement; it has and will inspire and overwhelm young African-Americans; it will, at the same time, precipitate a change in the self-definition of the United States. If the election of Obama signals a willingness on the part of the majority of voters to be “represented” by this man, then it follows that who “we” are is constituted anew: we are a nation of many races, of mixed races; and he offers us the occasion to recognize who we have become and what we have yet to be, and in this way a certain split between the representative function of the presidency and the populace represented appears to be overcome.  That is an exhilarating moment, to be sure.  But can it last, and should it?

To what consequences will this nearly messianic expectation invested in this man lead?  In order for this presidency to be successful, it will have to lead to some disappointment, and to survive disappointment: the man will become human, will prove less powerful than we might wish, and politics will cease to be a celebration without ambivalence and caution; indeed, politics will prove to be less of a messianic experience than a venue for robust debate, public criticism, and necessary antagonism.  The election of Obama means that the terrain for debate and struggle has shifted, and it is a better terrain, to be sure.  But it is not the end of struggle, and we would be very unwise to regard it that way, even provisionally.  We will doubtless agree and disagree with various actions he takes and fails to take.  But if the initial expectation is that he is and will be “redemption” itself, then we will punish him mercilessly when he fails us (or we will find ways to deny or suppress that disappointment in order to keep alive the experience of unity and unambivalent love). 

If a consequential and dramatic disappointment is to be averted, he will have to act quickly and well.  Perhaps the only way to avert a “crash” – a disappointment of serious proportions that would turn political will against him – will be to take decisive actions within the first two months of his presidency.  The first would be to close Guantanamo and find ways to transfer the cases of detainees to legitimate courts; the second would be to forge a plan for the withdrawal of troops from Iraq and to begin to implement that plan. The third would be to retract his bellicose remarks about escalating war in Afghanistan and pursue diplomatic, multilateral solutions in that arena.  If he fails to take these steps, his support on the left will clearly deteriorate, and we will see the reconfiguration of the split between liberal hawks and the anti-war left.  If he appoints the likes of Lawrence Summers to key cabinet positions, or continues the failed economic polices of Clinton and Bush, then at some point the messiah will be scorned as a false prophet.   In the place of an impossible promise, we need a series of concrete actions that can begin to reverse the terrible abrogation of justice committed by the Bush regime; anything less will lead to a dramatic and consequential disillusionment.  The question is what measure of dis-illusion is necessary in order to retrieve a critical politics, and what more dramatic form of dis-illusionment will return us to the intense political cynicism of the last years. Some relief from illusion is necessary, so that we might remember that politics is less about the person and the impossible and beautiful promise he represents than it is about the concrete changes in policy that might begin, over time, and with difficulty, bring about conditions of greater justice.

Don’t Just Do Something, Talk

Thursday, October 16th, 2008

On 24 September, John McCain suspended his campaign and went to Washington, proclaiming that it was time to put aside party differences. Was this gesture really a sign of his readiness to end partisan politics in order to deal with the real problems that concern us all? Definitely not: it was a ‘Mr McCain goes to Washington’ moment. Politics is precisely the struggle to define the ‘neutral’ terrain, which is why McCain’s proposal to reach across party lines was pure political posturing, a partisan politics in the guise of non-partisanship, a desperate attempt to impose his position as universal-apolitical. What is even worse than ‘partisan politics’ is a partisan politics that tries to mask itself as non-partisan: by imposing itself as the voice of the Whole, such a politics reduces its opponents by making them agents of particular interests.

- LRB - Slavoj Zizek: Don’t Just Do Something, Talk